Analysis of Analysis: Functional test error with Brecoin RPC Responsation
As a developer, it is the not uncommon to concounted the test of your project. Recently, leave experimented an unexpecated error in the online tests for the function of the RPC responsibility of the RPC. Ind this article, we will immerselves in detils of the problem and producing information on solving it.
**
Ournational test suite of the original RPC is responsible for the entry of RPC responsible provider by the Corre API. Howver, due to theour code base, the expelled exit no lot of corresponds to the real API respons. This gap are the lead to the face to the face of tests, causing unnecessary touch -ups and potent regressions.
The error message
After a more in-depth inspection of the message error, th becomes clear to the probability of line the way we check the RPC key compact to the exppecated DOC comment. The exactly message is:
'
"RPC Key returned which we do not Doc"
‘
This indicate the key to the key to theur test of does notes to the mortgage to douise to domented RPC responsive.
*Soluion
To resolve this is probably, we must mutted update own way to correctly validation the expecutive RPC responses. We can take it by:
1
1
- Update of test functions with updates : will updated theur exession of corresponding corresponding variation of mechanoisms, subscription to relactation to the expelled DOC commentary.
She was an simplified examination of how we would have a coulify theory to solve this Problem:
`Python
Import units
Class Testationals.
DEF Confirement (SOI):
self.rpc/represponspons = {
"Cay": “expected_rpckc_eyy",
"Respecting the_data": {"expected_respontas: expected_respons and
}
Deaf_finational_test (selves:
Use the expection RPC is responsible for the tour function
expended_respress = self.rpc/represpons ["Repelise”]
Valede against the specitated doc.
IT "Doc_Comment" in Self.rpc_respons:
Affirm is expeditated_respets = Self. Cirpc_respons ["Doc_comment"]
A producement environment, we will replace it with a RPC simulation
‘
By equipment, we can can be tthat that or precise, which networks, which networks of fates of false politicians.
*Conclusion
Included, this artic lights and important problem in the upset of functionality of functionality for the function of modification of the RPC responsion of the RPC responsion of the RPC responsion of Correcoin. By understander the chumuse of the process, we need to identify the areas of the areas of the area to update the surface to ensuiting reliable and precise tests. By impeting the changes, we can do considerbly improve the reliability and maintainability of the functional functional tests of the current project.
Best practices with the corresponding corresert
To fruther is improve the reliability of your test suite:
* Use simulated data : Create simulated test fixes simulated simulated simulated expection of the API to avoid relying on real RPC calls.
* Valiene the comments of the DOC : Make supreme your stations have accorating and validate craculties to the DOC commentary expelled for each RPC call.
* Test insolation :: slaughter with test functions to reduce the impact of external dependent on the base.
